Serie A xG Table 2025/26

#	Team	P	G	xG	/90	+/-
1	Inter	38	89	73.74	1.94	+15.3
2	Juventus	38	61	69.45	1.83	-8.5
3	Atalanta	38	51	64.81	1.71	-13.8
4	Como	38	65	60.75	1.6	+4.3
5	AC Milan	38	53	60.47	1.59	-7.5
6	Roma	38	59	56.32	1.48	+2.7
7	Napoli	38	58	55.74	1.47	+2.3
8	Fiorentina	38	41	51.57	1.36	-10.6
9	Bologna	38	49	50.18	1.32	-1.2
10	Torino	38	44	46.42	1.22	-2.4
11	Genoa	38	41	46.36	1.22	-5.4
12	Lazio	38	41	44.54	1.17	-3.5
13	Sassuolo	38	46	43.88	1.15	+2.1
14	Udinese	38	45	43.6	1.15	+1.4
15	Pisa	38	26	41.11	1.08	-15.1
16	Cagliari	38	40	38.71	1.02	+1.3
17	Hellas Verona	38	25	37.15	0.98	-12.2
18	Cremonese	38	32	36.29	0.96	-4.3
19	Parma	38	28	33.89	0.89	-5.9
20	Lecce	38	28	33.83	0.89	-5.8

#	Team	P	GA	xGA	/90	+/-
1	Inter	38	35	34.3	0.9	+0.7
2	Como	38	29	34.61	0.91	-5.6
3	Roma	38	31	37.69	0.99	-6.7
4	Juventus	38	34	38.06	1	-4.1
5	Napoli	38	36	40.42	1.06	-4.4
6	Bologna	38	46	42.78	1.13	+3.2
7	Atalanta	38	36	44.67	1.18	-8.7
8	AC Milan	38	35	47.21	1.24	-12.2
9	Hellas Verona	38	61	49.15	1.29	+11.9
10	Lazio	38	40	51.81	1.36	-11.8
11	Cagliari	38	53	53.39	1.41	-0.4
12	Fiorentina	38	50	54.48	1.43	-4.5
13	Sassuolo	38	50	54.89	1.44	-4.9
14	Udinese	38	48	55.62	1.46	-7.6
15	Genoa	38	51	56.1	1.48	-5.1
16	Torino	38	63	56.44	1.49	+6.6
17	Lecce	38	50	58.08	1.53	-8.1
18	Parma	38	46	59.18	1.56	-13.2
19	Pisa	38	71	59.39	1.56	+11.6
20	Cremonese	38	57	60.54	1.59	-3.5

#	Team	P	PTS	xPTS	/90	+/-
1	Inter	38	87	75.9	2	+11.1
2	Juventus	38	69	69.71	1.83	-0.7
3	Como	38	71	67.49	1.78	+3.5
4	Atalanta	38	59	65.09	1.71	-6.1
5	Roma	38	73	64.72	1.7	+8.3
6	Napoli	38	76	61.93	1.63	+14.1
7	AC Milan	38	70	60.58	1.59	+9.4
8	Bologna	38	56	56.53	1.49	-0.5
9	Fiorentina	38	42	50.66	1.33	-8.7
10	Lazio	38	54	46.72	1.23	+7.3
11	Torino	38	45	46.42	1.22	-1.4
12	Genoa	38	41	46.29	1.22	-5.3
13	Sassuolo	38	49	45.54	1.2	+3.5
14	Udinese	38	50	45.3	1.19	+4.7
15	Hellas Verona	38	21	44.57	1.17	-23.6
16	Cagliari	38	43	43.11	1.13	-0.1
17	Pisa	38	18	42.26	1.11	-24.3
18	Lecce	38	38	38.47	1.01	-0.5
19	Parma	38	45	38.38	1.01	+6.6
20	Cremonese	38	34	38.26	1.01	-4.3

#	Team	P	xG	xGA	xGD	/90
1	Inter	38	73.74	34.3	39.44	1.04
2	Juventus	38	69.45	38.06	31.39	0.83
3	Como	38	60.75	34.61	26.14	0.69
4	Atalanta	38	64.81	44.67	20.14	0.53
5	Roma	38	56.32	37.69	18.63	0.49
6	Napoli	38	55.74	40.42	15.32	0.4
7	AC Milan	38	60.47	47.21	13.26	0.35
8	Bologna	38	50.18	42.78	7.4	0.19
9	Fiorentina	38	51.57	54.48	-2.91	-0.08
10	Lazio	38	44.54	51.81	-7.27	-0.19
11	Genoa	38	46.36	56.1	-9.74	-0.26
12	Torino	38	46.42	56.44	-10.02	-0.26
13	Sassuolo	38	43.88	54.89	-11.01	-0.29
14	Hellas Verona	38	37.15	49.15	-12	-0.32
15	Udinese	38	43.6	55.62	-12.02	-0.32
16	Cagliari	38	38.71	53.39	-14.68	-0.39
17	Pisa	38	41.11	59.39	-18.28	-0.48
18	Lecce	38	33.83	58.08	-24.25	-0.64
19	Cremonese	38	36.29	60.54	-24.25	-0.64
20	Parma	38	33.89	59.18	-25.29	-0.67

#	Team	P	G	npxG	xG	/90
1	Inter	38	89	69	73.74	1.94
2	Juventus	38	61	65.5	69.45	1.83
3	Atalanta	38	51	62.44	64.81	1.71
4	Como	38	65	54.43	60.75	1.6
5	AC Milan	38	53	53.36	60.47	1.59
6	Napoli	38	58	51.79	55.74	1.47
7	Roma	38	59	50.79	56.32	1.48
8	Fiorentina	38	41	46.83	51.57	1.36
9	Bologna	38	49	44.65	50.18	1.32
10	Torino	38	44	40.89	46.42	1.22
11	Sassuolo	38	46	40.72	43.88	1.15
12	Lazio	38	41	40.59	44.54	1.17
13	Udinese	38	45	39.65	43.6	1.15
14	Genoa	38	41	39.25	46.36	1.22
15	Cagliari	38	40	37.13	38.71	1.02
16	Pisa	38	26	35.58	41.11	1.08
17	Hellas Verona	38	25	34.78	37.15	0.98
18	Cremonese	38	32	33.13	36.29	0.96
19	Parma	38	28	32.31	33.89	0.89
20	Lecce	38	28	32.25	33.83	0.89

#	Team	P	G	xGoT	xG	/90
1	Inter	38	89	74.79	73.74	1.94
2	Juventus	38	61	64.72	69.45	1.83
3	Roma	38	59	61.04	56.32	1.48
4	Como	38	65	56.43	60.75	1.6
5	Atalanta	38	51	56.23	64.81	1.71
6	Napoli	38	58	56.22	55.74	1.47
7	AC Milan	38	53	49.37	60.47	1.59
8	Torino	38	44	48.8	46.42	1.22
9	Genoa	38	41	45.4	46.36	1.22
10	Lazio	38	41	44.95	44.54	1.17
11	Sassuolo	38	46	44.92	43.88	1.15
12	Bologna	38	49	44.9	50.18	1.32
13	Fiorentina	38	41	40.88	51.57	1.36
14	Udinese	38	45	39.77	43.6	1.15
15	Cremonese	38	32	38.36	36.29	0.96
16	Cagliari	38	40	38.12	38.71	1.02
17	Pisa	38	26	32.42	41.11	1.08
18	Hellas Verona	38	25	30.45	37.15	0.98
19	Lecce	38	28	28.55	33.83	0.89
20	Parma	38	28	26.27	33.89	0.89

Upcoming Fixtures (Next 14 Days)

Show xG:

Showing home xG for home teams, away xG for away teams Showing overall xG for all teams

No upcoming fixtures available.

Download This Data as CSV

Get full access to xG, xGA, xPTS, and 30+ metrics for every team. Export to CSV and power your own analysis.

Unlock CSV Downloads

50+ Leagues 30+ Metrics Updated Daily

The Serie A xG table for 2025/26 tracks expected goals data for all 20 teams. This includes xG (expected goals), xGA (expected goals against), xPTS (expected points), npxG (non-penalty xG), xGoT (expected goals on target), and the goals vs xG overperformance metric.

Who has the best attack?

Inter top the xG charts with 73.74 expected goals from 38 games (1.94/90). They have scored 89 actual goals, outperforming their xG by +15.3.

Who has the best defence?

Inter have the tightest defence by xGA, conceding just 34.3 expected goals (0.9/90). Their actual goals conceded stands at 35.

Biggest overperformer

Inter are the biggest overperformers in Serie A, scoring 89 goals from an xG of just 73.74 — a difference of +15.3. This could indicate clinical finishing or luck that may not be sustainable over the full season.

Biggest underperformer

Pisa are the most wasteful in front of goal, scoring 26 from an xG of 41.11 (diff: -15.1). Regression towards their xG would suggest improvement is likely.

Understanding the xG metrics

xG (Expected Goals): The total expected goals a team should have scored based on the quality of their chances.
xGA (Expected Goals Against): How many goals a team should have conceded — lower is better.
xPTS (Expected Points): How many league points a team deserves based on xG performance.
npxG (Non-Penalty xG): xG excluding penalties, giving a truer picture of open-play chance creation.
xGoT (xG on Target): Expected goals from shots that were on target only.
+/- (Overperformance): The difference between actual goals and xG. Positive = overperforming, negative = underperforming.

Data is updated daily, powered by advanced xG models covering 50+ competitions. Learn more about how xG works.

Data last updated: 2026-06-08 01:41:10

What Serie A team has the best xG?

Inter leads for xG with 73.74 total (1.94/90) across 38 games. They have scored 89 goals, overperforming their xG by 15.3.

What Serie A team has the best xGA?

Inter has the best defence by xGA with just 34.3 expected goals against (0.9/90). They have conceded 35 goals in 38 games.

What Serie A team has the most xPTS?

Inter tops xPTS with 75.9 (2/90). With 87 actual points, they are overperforming by 11.1 points.

Which Serie A team is overperforming their xG the most?

Inter has scored 89 goals from an xG of 73.74, overperforming by +15.3 goals. This suggests they are finishing chances at an unsustainable rate, or have exceptional individual quality up front.

Which Serie A team is underperforming their xG the most?

Pisa has scored 26 goals from an xG of 41.11, underperforming by -15.1 goals. This indicates poor finishing or bad luck — regression towards their xG is likely.

What is xG in football?

xG (Expected Goals) measures the quality of chances created. Each shot is assigned a probability of being scored based on factors like distance, angle, body part, and assist type. A team's total xG reflects how many goals they should have scored based on their chances. Read more about xG.

Filter for xG, Odds, Form, and More!

OddAlerts has one of the most powerful filtering tools, combining hundreds of data points including xG to find high-value games.

Join Pro

Probability & Predictions

Fixtures & Stats

Tools & Alerts

Trends

Player Data

Stay Connected

Serie A xG Table 2025/26 - Expected Goals Stats

xG, xGA, xPTS, npxG & xGoT for all 20 Serie A teams

Download This Data as CSV